Recent Updates RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Smart Car Wreck Guru 8:51 am on March 5, 2015 Permalink | Reply  

    Bloody Smart Car Wreck 

    Is it blood or paint, I can’t tell.

     
    • Smart Car Wreck Guru 8:55 am on March 5, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      Good to be back!

  • Smart Car Wreck Guru 9:42 pm on February 24, 2015 Permalink | Reply  

    Missing Smart Car 

    Which side is up I’m confused.

    hqdefault

     
  • Smart Car Wreck Guru 9:40 pm on February 24, 2015 Permalink | Reply  

    Cracked Smart Car 

    Cracked like a cracker

    20215067

     
  • Smart Car Wreck Guru 1:54 pm on September 25, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Crushed Smart Car 

    Crushed it is.Smart Car Wreck - Crushed Smart Car

     
    • Leslie 10:22 am on January 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Wow this is the dumbest web site ive ever seen WTF get your facts straight and stop the bull this site shouldnt be on the internet!

      • Unka G 11:18 am on January 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Truth hurts, doesn’t it??????

        • Anonymous 5:11 pm on February 29, 2012 Permalink | Reply

          if smart cars are so dangerous, then why does the Insurance Rating for them sit at 7, which is the lowest? you are an idiot. and probably Darwinian.

          • Anonymous 4:00 pm on July 23, 2012 Permalink | Reply

            Because they are classified under motorcycles because of engine displacement.

          • Darwin 6:52 pm on October 20, 2012 Permalink | Reply

            Most God fearing persons are blind IDIOTS

            • Rick 6:38 pm on April 5, 2013 Permalink

              What the hell are you smoking Darwood or whatever your name is??? You are a complete idiot if you argue the safety of a “Smart Car.” So you think a Smart Car is as safe as a Volvo or Subaru or even a Chevy Geo (another car that is another deathtrap), then you need a basic class in physics. Then to attack a group of people who happen to believe in an ideology of religion is really so grown up of you. Most of the smartest, critical and compassionate people happen to believe in an entity that brings them comfort and morality in which your kind of people lack. Hey go ahead and attack me too Durwin or whatever your name is. I am agnostic, but believe that the Bible teaches you right from wrong, how to be respectful to others and the basics of morality. All of these things are righteous and keeps many people who believe or have faith to stay out of trouble and treat people with respect and decency. Not you though Dipwit or whatever your name is???? Your type of like minded fools can only argue by using offensive language and name calling. Something I normally avoid, but what’s good for the liberal is good enough for me in this instance. Anon has used facts by being informed and solid facts whereas your facts are half baked, especially the insurance comment. Now if you were talking to one of your liberal pals and said the smart car is safe because of its insurance rating would never disagree with you because they are uninformed sheep who are to lazy to point out the fact that the insurance rating is based on a four stroke motorcycle cycle rating. God forbid if you ever gave the entire insurance fact. Of course the stupid lazy liberal would never question the words of another commie loser. Anon owned you in this debate Darwin. Sheesh!

          • Steve 10:33 am on May 14, 2013 Permalink | Reply

            Since someone brought up Darwin, I’d like to mention that’s exactly why I love Smart Cars. I am tired of leftwing fundamentalists forcing their green religion down my throat and using guilt and shame to bully legislators into imposing this religion onto me (A religion that most of the followers don’t even follow). With environmentalists being gullible and scientifically ignorant people, I’d actually rather they weren’t breeding and further polluting our gene pool, and products like this are a great way to thin out the herd. Unfortunately they aren’t effective enough.

      • Anonymous 9:57 am on May 17, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        I think this website is great. I’ts simple physics.

      • Anonymous 12:16 pm on August 22, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        leslie thats like an ignorant name you want a key to the city

      • Anonymous 4:31 pm on December 3, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        touchy touchy, just wondering if it had the paul bearers pkg , and a hinged roof for wake viewing

    • Wasted 2:50 am on October 29, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Woah, I love this site! It’s quite entertaining!

      That must have hurt like mad!

    • Anonymous 11:59 am on January 2, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      All cars look like this when wrecked. Why don’t you show others? Or bikes for that matter?

    • Anonymous 10:05 pm on January 21, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      Because its about wrecked smart cars… That get less mileage than my 55mpg 94′ Geo Metro. If it makes you feel good and sexy to see other cars smashed start your own site.

    • Louis 4:45 pm on February 28, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      It’s just good fun to see cars wrecked. Especially when they are smashed into a little cube like the one above

    • anon 3:55 pm on March 26, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      Allot of these cars are not Smart Cars?
      What is your point Web Site owner?

    • Johne345 10:04 am on April 30, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      Android Game Development takes more than knowledge aeckbbebgdek

    • Krystyna Wheeler 7:33 am on January 21, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      Spot on with this write-up, I honestly believe that this site needs a lot more attention. I’ll probably be returning to see more, thanks for the info!

      • Smart Car Wreck Guru 9:03 pm on February 24, 2015 Permalink | Reply

        We’re cleaning it up. Thank you.

  • Smart Car Wreck Guru 3:21 am on December 18, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Your day to day smart car accident 

    Accident at 5 miler per hour completely wrecks smart car.

     
    • Anonymous 8:44 pm on December 18, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      smart car has 5 mph bumpers, so the statement above the pic is not true

      • uberpanzer 12:05 am on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Her speed didn’t matter, the car was impaled by a tree branch. Quote from the article linked below:

        “Officials said heavy winds broke the dead tree branch and it crashed into the woman’s Smart car. The weight of the branch broke through the windshield and the branch impaled the driver. ”

        http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=7747339

        Please do some more research of your totally awesome pics before posting mis-information.

    • The Truth about the guru 3:19 am on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      It’s obvious that the “Smart car wreck Guru” is nothing more than an ignorant thief that steals photos and posts them to prove that the “Guru” does not know anything about the car in the photo or what happened in the photo.

      • trollhater 8:34 am on March 3, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Its OBVIOUS that you have nothing to do but troll around websites. Tough being in your moms basement aint it?

    • Anonymous 3:19 pm on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      DUMBA$$ – 5 mph my ass

    • mike 12:34 am on February 11, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      so far this site has confirmed that the smart is much safer than a suzuki little suv and a ford focus and a little ford suv. Unless I have a freak accident with a gigantic 300lb tree branch, in which case I would even be impailed with my silverado whose roof was crushed by a 3 story aluminum ladder half folded maybe 70lbs. Thank you for your time and effort I might buy a smart car now and put a turbo on it.

      • dylan 1:01 pm on April 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        I have a 02 chevy silverado and if you even bump it with your elbo it puts a dent in the sinking thing so ya those cars dont look unsafe.

    • Anonymous 5:35 pm on March 2, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Ooooh! i think guru got SCHOOOOOOLED!!! HAHA!

    • Anonymous 12:24 pm on June 4, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      The guy who runs this website obviously has it out for smart cars. Perhaps a member of his family died in one. What a moron.

    • JoeMarzola 8:13 am on April 7, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Wow, I’d never drive a death trap like the smart car.

  • Smart Car Wreck Guru 3:17 am on December 18, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Where is the baby? 

    Imagine having a baby sitting in this thing!

     
    • Larry 1:16 am on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Yep, this is a Smart, but it’s not in a wreck. That “thing” sticking out the top of the roof is a Google Streetview Camera, used to take continuous pictures of every house on the planet. One of my friends has one sticking out of his Toyota and is on the road every day, somewhere. This car was VANDALIZED, not in a wreck. They picked it up and set it on its back because the engine and tranny are in back. I can almost pick mine up in the front and it would only take 3 guys to do this VANDALISM to a smart.

      • Evil 6:34 pm on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Sorry Larry but you are wrong. This is a traffic enforcement car in the London borough of Enfield.
        It cruises around and takes photos of cars in bus lanes, people driving on their mobile phone, people not wearing seat belts etc.
        In this particular scenario the traffic enforcement car pulled into the train station car park but didn’t realise there was a height restriction bar. You can see it bent on the right.

        £150 and it was all OK again.

    • Anonymous 3:19 pm on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Smart car wreck guru must be a stupid punk kid hahahahahaha

    • Anonymous 2:36 am on March 3, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      You wouldn’t put a baby in these things… smart or not, any parent knows that you can’t put a child in a rear-facing seat in the front seat of a car… and I wouldn’t put a toddler in the front of this, or any car, particularly with airbags. (which I’m not sure if this has, but an accident I saw with a smart about a month ago had air-bag-deployment, so I would figure all smarts would be equipped?)

  • Smart Car Wreck Guru 10:15 pm on October 17, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Cool wrecks!

     
    • Anonymous 4:47 pm on January 29, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      The airbags only work if you are over 80 pounds and it has everything needed for any child and is as safe as any other car you should do your research before opening your mouth.

  • Smart Car Wreck Guru 3:10 am on September 6, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    Smart Car Wreck – Side Impact 

    Smart Car Wreck - Side Impact

    Smart Car Wreck - Side Impact

     
    • Anonymous 11:08 am on September 6, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      is this for real?

      • Anonymous 8:46 pm on December 18, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        this is a picture from an IIHS crash test where the smart car protected its driver and passenger from serious injuries. standard 35-40 mph side impact test

    • Larry 1:19 am on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Got my full coverage insurance renewal from State Farm, last week for another 6 months. Low deductable collision was only $140 ($280/year). Smart must have a horrible insurance record for it to be this LOW…..(c;]

      PS, I live in North Charleston, SC, the 2nd largest city in the state.

      • Anonymous 2:31 pm on October 24, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Why would insurance be high? When all you need to do is to pay the cost of a body bag times the passengers after the wreck?

    • Wasted 2:53 am on October 29, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      That looks quite nasty…

  • Smart Car Wreck Guru 3:03 am on September 6, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    Smart Car Wreck – Flying Smart Car 

    Smart Car Wreck - Flying Smart Car

    Smart Car Wreck - Flying Smart Car

     
    • Rich 5:53 am on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      This looks like a clip taken from the test done when a smart car was driven into a concrete barrier at 70 miles per hour. Notice the passenger compartment is still intact. No one’s brain would survive that deceleration in any car. Let it fly.

  • Smart Car Wreck Guru 2:50 am on September 6, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    Smart Car Wreck on Sidewalk 

    Smart Car Wreck on Sidewalk

    Smart Car Wreck on Sidewalk

     
    • Anonymous 8:35 pm on December 18, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      not a smart car…appears to be a 4 door and no Tridion cell to protect occupants

      • Larry 1:11 am on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Excellent point. It has 4 doors and no cell. Also has 4 wheel bolts. It’s not a Smart.

        • Tim 7:10 am on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

          What kind of moron are you, to start a website about a particular car, then fill it with pictures that are NOT of that car? Do you just go around looking for pictures of small cars in wrecks and throw them in? Or do you take other moron’s word for it that a car is a smart, without even doing things like counting doors, or lug nuts? I hope you’re doing this for a grade in school, and your teachers sees how ignorant you are, and gives you an appropriate grade.

        • allen mohr 11:33 pm on June 11, 2011 Permalink | Reply

          this isnt a smart car tho ur right

      • Evil 6:36 pm on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        It’s a Renault Clio.

    • Anonymous 3:16 pm on December 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      ANOTHER FALSE PICTURE _ NAT A SMART CAR _ YOU MUST BA A DUMBA$$

    • Anonymous 8:23 pm on July 2, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      WOW…if you thought that was a Smart car….YOU AINT!!!!!

    • Черный Пуэр 7:11 am on October 22, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      sait — зеленый чай

    • Ed 1:50 pm on February 22, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      This is the worst website I’ve ever seen. Came for Smart Cars, but mostly found falsehoods, fabrications, flim-flams, and fakery.

    • частные объявления Санкт-Петербург 3:53 pm on March 7, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      — доска объявлений бесплатно —

    • harry 5:11 pm on August 24, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      not a smart car you are an idiot

    • Anonymous 10:36 am on August 25, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      Silly people. Don’t you think there are a few too many doors and lugnuts for this to be a smart?

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel